Why Your Planning Teams Need Board Foresight Before 2026: The Predictive Advantage for Confident, Continuous Planning
Most finance and retail leaders enter year-end planning cycles relying on backward-looking methods that consistently…
This is the second in a series exploring the IHL Group’s comprehensive Inventory Distortion Study, research that exposes the staggering scale of global retail’s inventory crisis and the path forward.
In our first post, we headlined the staggering $1.7 trillion global inventory distortion crisis. Now, let’s examine what’s causing these losses and why understanding the root causes matters more than ever for retail planning transformation.

The Real Cost of Empty Shelves
When we talk about $690.9 billion in out-of-stock losses globally, we’re not describing a simple replenishment problem, like the items are just in a storeroom. According to IHL’s research, this represents a fundamental planning breakdown across multiple dimensions.
Empty shelves tell only part of the story. The largest single contributor at $690.9 billion signals systematic failures in demand sensing, supplier coordination, and planning horizons that are simply too short. Retailers are patching a leaky bucket rather than planning ahead, constantly reacting to shortages instead of anticipating needs or staying ahead of demand.
But out-of-stocks also impacts the retailers brand promise. Customer experience is impacted when shoppers can’t find help in stores, that’s $165.6 billion in annual losses. When associates locate customers but can’t find items the system claims are available, that’s another $145.2 billion disappearing. These aren’t inventory problems. They’re planning execution gaps where the right stock exists somewhere, but stale, brittle processes and disconnected systems prevent it from reaching customers when they are ready to buy.
Price and promotional mismatches add $77.4 billion more, revealing poor integration between marketing initiatives and inventory availability. When promotions run but products aren’t on shelves, or when pricing doesn’t sync with actual stock levels, we see the downstream consequences of planning silos.

The Overstock Equation
The $572 billion overstock problem reveals equally telling patterns about planning effectiveness.

Where the Problems Originate
IHL’s functional analysis reveals where distortion originates across the ecosystem:
What This Means for Retail Planning – Chapter 1 of IHL’s research reveals that the $1.73 trillion inventory distortion problem stems from disconnected planning processes across the value chain. The data points to a clear pattern: retailers achieving superior performance share three characteristics: unified data platforms, continuous scenario planning and integrated AI-powered forecasting.
Understanding these root causes transforms how we approach inventory management. The goal isn’t perfecting replenishment algorithms or implementing better forecasting tools in isolation. It’s building planning frameworks that:
Connect strategic objectives with operational plans and execution:
The $1.73 trillion problem isn’t fundamentally a technology problem, a process problem, or a people problem. It’s a planning problem. And solving it requires approaching planning itself differently.
Listen to the companion podcast here>